Passan’s report says that Manfred reportedly responded that he was “not going to get the [expletive] out of here.” Manfred’s main source of argument comes from his view that it’s an important issue to discuss and has a direct impact on the game of baseball.
Nick Castellanos, who’s been known to have a fiery side of personality himself, helped to mediate the situation by saying, “I have more questions” to Manfred. Because the meeting continued, things settled down, and eventually, Manfred and Harper shook hands. Though Harper did not answer phone calls from Manfred the next day.
“It was pretty intense, definitely passionate. Both of ’em. The commissioner giving it back to Bryce and Bryce giving it back to the commissioner. That’s Harp. He’s been doing this since he was 15-years-old,” Castellanos told ESPN.
Both Harper and Manfred declined to comment to ESPN on the matter.
Manfred is certainly in a difficult spot with players themselves against a salary cap, as well as the MLB Players Association, which is adamantly against it. But some team owners are for it, most notably Baltimore Orioles owner David Rubenstein, who purchased the club in August 2024.
It’s certainly worth noting that the 1994 players’ strike was a result of the league’s effort to move to a salary-cap system. That is the worst-case scenario for MLB. And it seems to stress out Manfred.
“Rob seems to be in a pretty desperate place on how important it is to get this salary cap,” Castellanos added in his comments to ESPN, “because he’s floating the word lockout two years in advance of our collective bargaining agreement [expiration]. That’s nothing to throw around. That’s the same thing as me in a marriage saying, ‘I think divorce is a possibility. It’s probably going to happen.’ You don’t just say those things.”
It’s also important to note that Harper is a client of baseball super agent Scott Boras, and Castellanos is a former Boras client who now represents himself. Boras is known for bargaining for a ton of money for his clients, so that may provide one explanation of many for why Harper would be so against the discussion.
It seems the only thing all parties can agree on is that no one wants a work stoppage in Major League Baseball. But that might just be where the agreements end.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by PostX News and is published from a syndicated feed.)